|
Post by jean on Mar 7, 2010 16:14:31 GMT
'Girlikins'... yes, it does seem a rather frivolous epithet to apply to child-molesters and would-be rapists.
|
|
|
Post by bets unplugged on Mar 7, 2010 21:22:56 GMT
forgive me,
i have found it best not to waste time reading the lengthier toad posts.....so - who is he actually name-calling at?
girlikins..... seems like a derogatory term for female persons, to me.
i never thought that this muddled poster would be the type to diss women - but you learn something new every day.
|
|
|
Post by jean on Mar 7, 2010 21:42:54 GMT
From his last post, bets:
Jean has kindly provided links to show herself and Betty last year providing ever argument used by every rapist against my saying that there is something wrong and perverse about forcing sex on somebody who has made it clear they do not want it until they give in. Now, on this forum in the last week, Betty is saying exactly what she was arguing with Jean against my saying all last year.
I thought if I posted a link to the MCL thread, everyone including him would be able to see what was actually written on it.
I should have known better.
|
|
|
Post by Jade on Mar 8, 2010 10:08:16 GMT
Dunno Bets - not from me. Poor toad has to peg women in certain ways, he has me as a spoilt teenager without maturity (because I have not grown up enough to agree with him) but it is really water off a ducks back. As he does not know "me" as disctinct from any other "feminist" he knows I cannot take any insult that seriously.
I have made clear on these boards (and to him specifically) that I hold a set of views. When they do not fit in with his view of who I am he develops a form of blindness and cannnot read them.
then of course he gets hugely upset that I hold them (as in this case where I have a view that is women choose parenthood over any other form of career then I applaud a society that supports that choice) because it doesn't fit in with the way he demands I behave.
so, because I know that his prejudice blinds him to my reality, I cannot really give any credence to his insults, can I? The are not made at me, they are made at one of the many voices in his head.
He can call me girlikins if he likes - he has to belittle me as otherwise he might have to accept that I am the person I am, instead of who he wishes me to be.
|
|
|
Post by Jade on Mar 8, 2010 10:11:45 GMT
i never thought that this muddled poster would be the type to diss women - but you learn something new every day. You're kidding, right? I have never seen toad be nice to any woman, ever! Even the woman who was his staunchest supporter, his most admiring friend, who actually (at great personal risk) did the meeting thing - even she cannot spend time on a message board where he intrudes as he is most awful to her. Perhaps he does not spread bile at everyone on first meeting, but try and get your point of view across about anything he has a view of and see what happens. Dare ya!
|
|
|
Post by Synonym on Mar 15, 2010 15:00:09 GMT
He did get on well with HandsomFortune as I recall, and Spesh, when everyone thought that he was female. Think it is more feminists who are like a red rag to a bull. Don't mention the war, as it were, and you should be OK, if I have got it right
|
|
|
Post by jean on Mar 21, 2010 23:16:13 GMT
He did get on well with HandsomeFortune as I recall... Yes - that was because she regularly expressed admiration for his (supposed) deep learning. He was always very susceptible to flattery. Can't say I remember much about that relationship.
|
|
pippa
WH Member
Posts: 230
|
Post by pippa on Mar 25, 2010 13:57:56 GMT
|
|