|
Post by sinistral on Jul 24, 2010 13:34:46 GMT
In the case od Sim I stepped in simply because of the long-winded self-righteousness of those doing the attacking - the thread ran to over 25 pages! Goodness.... only 25 pages? Obviously not a thread you made much contribution to then dear. Depends what you mean,Joe. I have not seen him posting under the name Sim since your board disappeared. Whether he posts under another name/s elsewhere I know not. We were not in the habit of exchanging PMs.
|
|
|
Post by naymissus on Jul 24, 2010 13:57:03 GMT
Not even abusve PM's? You surprise me! ;D
|
|
|
Post by sinistral on Jul 24, 2010 14:42:13 GMT
Not even abusve PM's? You surprise me! Well you know him better than I do. Didn't know he was into that sort of thing.
|
|
pippa
WH Member
Posts: 230
|
Post by pippa on Jul 25, 2010 8:33:35 GMT
Isn't it interesting..... That the two people going on and on about an "anti-Johnny cabal" are now running a similar campaign against another poster. I think the irony of this is quite beyond them. i take it you hadn't noticed that the exposee here on this board has been infinitesimal timewise compared with the long drawn out campaign in 'the taking down of Johnny' game. and unfortunately Sin, as long as a certain poster's behaviour described in the OP of "nutters on WOM" continues, then i feel obliged to expose the series of connections and a chain reaction that links back to when it was first instigated (long long before the thread i linked to from "your" board). it is the same behaviour that happened on the old beeb WH board where a number of posters encountered rather unpleasant and underhand tactical behaviour from the dominant clique which came out of the cakeboard stable. you don't seem to have cottoned one how it works, and indeed got sucked into it yourself.
|
|
|
Post by sinistral on Jul 25, 2010 9:17:45 GMT
Isn't it interesting..... That the two people going on and on about an "anti-Johnny cabal" are now running a similar campaign against another poster. I think the irony of this is quite beyond them. i take it you hadn't noticed that the exposee here on this board has been infinitesimal timewise compared with the long drawn out campaign in 'the taking down of Johnny' game. and unfortunately Sin, as long as a certain poster's behaviour described in the OP of "nutters on WOM" continues, then i feel obliged to expose the series of connections and a chain reaction that links back to when it was first instigated (long long before the thread i linked to from "your" board). it is the same behaviour that happened on the old beeb WH board where a number of posters encountered rather unpleasant and underhand tactical behaviour from the dominant clique which came out of the cakeboard stable. you don't seem to have cottoned one how it works, and indeed got sucked into it yourself. But you see m'dear....I know exactly how it works. Now,if I might refer you to my reply #14 on the "Bobbies on bicycles two by two" thread where your defence of JM is shown to be highly selective. I shall be interested to learn why your anti-bullying campaign stretches only as far as members of my board.
|
|
pippa
WH Member
Posts: 230
|
Post by pippa on Jul 25, 2010 15:26:01 GMT
But you see m'dear....I know exactly how it works. Now,if I might refer you to my reply #14 on the "Bobbies on bicycles two by two" thread where your defence of JM is shown to be highly selective. I shall be interested to learn why your anti-bullying campaign stretches only as far as members of my board. if you have a look at my #20 there, you'll see that i have replied. actually, it stretches much further back than what was linked to on " your'' board. it goes back, as i have oft repeated, to mornington crescent/2008, where i first noticed a pattern - and have kept an eye on it ever since. it's been a long, long running vendetta. however as to your board, seeing as your first post on this board was to join the discussion that was relevant to JM, 'nutters on WoM' (and you had already posted a link to "your" board) , the contradiction occurred to me.
|
|