|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Jul 2, 2012 18:22:44 GMT
Has anyone had any news?
What about little fat Gerda, the myopic ginger truck driver and part-time climatologist courtesy of the OU?. Anyone seen her on top of her mighty beast lately?
All this rain instead of global warming must be a bit of a surprise for her? Don't worry love, it's just a blocking pattern due to change in the jet stream!
|
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Jul 2, 2012 18:27:47 GMT
Anyone heard from Gillo, or Golli, as I like to think of her?
Last heard of in a flatlet in my very own Leeds with a BABY, god help her little cotton socks! Must be school age now. Did her "baby daddy" ever get round to marrying her? No, well hardly surprising given her way with words! And anyway, marriage is only in fashion with gays these days, because they think they're worth it, apparently. Was golli, "worth it"? Does anyone know?
News, please!
|
|
|
|
Post by unskilledman on Jul 2, 2012 18:32:55 GMT
Has anyone had any news? What about little fat Gerda, the myopic ginger truck driver and part-time climatologist courtesy of the OU?. Anyone seen her on top of her mighty beast lately? All this rain instead of global warming must be a bit of a surprise for her? Don't worry love, it's just a blocking pattern due to change in the jet stream! Boss says that I'm to tell you to stop goading people. Apparently that's why got upset with you all last time. He says when his back is better if you are still at it he won't come here. |
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Jul 2, 2012 18:36:42 GMT
What about Spesh, the phantom of the BBC boards, banned for stalking nay, yet forever re-appearing under various ingenious pseudonyms from some library, wasn't it, when the mods went home for the weekend?
One-time cyber-paramour of innocent jean, who really did believe Spesh was distaff along with the rest of the BBC WH gang who rallied round to defend their heroine(?). Sorry about that discriminatory inegalitarian diminutive feminine form. (Not really, I only do it to annoy!)
Last known photograph with a cove with a banjo or was it a eukelele, scowling into the camera. VERY frightening pair, for those of a nervous disposition? Are they still posting?
Up to date information, please!
|
|
|
|
Post by Father Time on Jul 2, 2012 18:37:09 GMT
What about little fat Gerda, the myopic ginger truck driver and part-time climatologist courtesy of the OU?. The OU.Do they do sociology or is it beneath them? |
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Jul 2, 2012 18:43:35 GMT
The OU do sociology? Certainly. I was a teacher for them for a while before I found better way to earn a living self-employed.
I think "Environmental Studies" is the new pariah subject at the OU, but don't tell, Gerda, she shouldn't give up the day job!
|
|
history repeats itself
Guest
|
Post by history repeats itself on Jul 2, 2012 18:43:59 GMT
That quote in full.
"Sorry! That's not how it is, chav. Marriage, as you have belatedly come around to finally acknowledging, has OTHER "functions" - jeez, how painfully obvious it is you were taught "sociology" in the 60s - which are quite independent of any putative role it might sometimes but not necessarily fulfill for parenting children. Marriage can exist without that role at all, as you've also acknowledged. It can perfom its other functions, all the same. So what the hell is your point? You simply haven't got one -= this whole silly ignorant argument is based on nothing but a misunderstanding of what marriage is, and how it is defined. And you've made that facile error not because that was what you were taught, even in those dismal days, in that pathetic discipline. No one has ever been so thick as to share your misunderstanding. You've made it because you're prejudiced against homosexuals, and you've clutched at this nonsensical reductionist definition of what "marriage" is so you can say - well, if it's "function" is to breed, obviously homosexuals can't partake in it. The argument is so moronic and obviously false it's not even worth responding to, and this is certainly the last time I'll do so. You're a closed-minded unthinking bigot, determined at all costs to hold onto your stupid prejudices at the cost of all rational logic or even respect for facts, and quite simply you've lost every scrap of credibility you ever had as far as I'm concerned".
|
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Jul 2, 2012 18:47:43 GMT
If you're viewing this, jonjel, you'll remember you were warned way back about these gels and their winning ways! Not a patch on dear Ravaged not Ruined, alas! You were spoiled!
|
|
|
|
Post by unskilledman on Jul 2, 2012 18:51:34 GMT
Apparently it is one of those "soft" subjects. Talked all about in another thread. Probably useful if you want to become a landlady. |
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Jul 2, 2012 18:59:06 GMT
Absolutely! And indispensable if you want to run a cafe, a home for the Elderly or an Introductions Agency! All accomplished without state subsidy! My education must have done me some good! What about yours, though?
Truck driving is another useful trade. How does young Gerda square it with her hatred of fossil fuel? Another case of do as I say not as I do? Tough choices for these Greenies!
|
|
|
|
Post by unskilledman on Jul 2, 2012 19:00:46 GMT
All the myopic ginger bandy legs has to stop. My man doesn't like it. You ladies ought to learn how to behave like gentlemen. Why o why do you have to be all bitchy like this? Not a good advert for your sex. Not you Jean, I know but you "soft" subject wallahs not making my boss happy.
|
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Jul 2, 2012 19:18:37 GMT
I protest! Jean is not a lady she is a lesbian . To claim otherwise is sexist and homophobic. Anyway, she is "worth it". (And don't ask me what "it" is.)
Jean is also Green and that subsumes sexual identity (see also aforementioned "Gerda".)
|
|
|
|
Post by jean on Jul 2, 2012 20:12:34 GMT
Good grief, marchesa! And you try to tell us that the gels are obsessed with you!
|
|
|
|
Post by aquatic on Jul 2, 2012 21:11:41 GMT
Oh, she's just practising her ad hominems*, like what she isn't practised against with.
*jean, I sense that the phrase embraces both male and female, but if that isn't so, please give us the version for a lady/lesbian.
|
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Jul 2, 2012 21:22:35 GMT
Well, it would be discourteous to ignore their repeated attentions, jean. And unlike them I am a lady. Where are my gloves, jeeves?
Amazing that that a mere male's opining has been able to whip them up into such an extraordinary rage. They've clearly lost the plot. Have they taken out a contract on me, I wonder?
It's only a message board, dearies. No-one takes any notice of me at all, usually. So what has set them buzzing with such noisy, pseudonymous angst? And poor jonjel, getting it in the neck, too!
I'm not so sure that Nick will be all that pleased to be the hive's new poster boy. Uh-oh!
|
|
