|
Post by cleefarqhuar on Dec 19, 2014 13:50:27 GMT
Mr Farage telling a few home-truths Hands up all those that have not said at some time they are going for a Chinky takeawy (Jean excepted - she invariably consults her Guardian 'The right things to say and laugh at' guide to anti-racism before writing, saying, or laughing at anything. This is a slow process but it imbues her with that Papish infallibility that some find quite irritating) Mr Smith stood down as candidate for South Basildon and East Thurrock - regarded as one of Ukip's most winnable target constituencies - earlier this month after the release of a recording of a phone call in which he mocked gay party members as "poofters", joked about shooting people from Chigwell in a "peasant hunt" and referred to someone as a "chinky bird". He later resigned as a party member.
Mr Farage told LBC: "I'm a bit sad, because Kerry Smith is a rough diamond. He's a council house boy from the East End of London, left school early and talks and speaks in a way that a lot of people from that background do.
"I feel a bit sorry for Kerry Smith, because I think he's a genuine fellow.
"Even the 'poofter' comment - the next sentence he was saying how good a candidate was and the fact he was gay would be an asset to the party.
"I think he's had a tough time. However, he's not suitable to be a parliamentary candidate.
"I think we are very snobbish in London about condemning people for the colloquial language they use, particularly if it's not meant with really unpleasant intent.
"Kerry himself said that he used language that Del Boy used to use on Only Fools and Horses, and nobody objected then.
"Kerry Smith is not suitable to be a parliamentary candidate. I don't think that in the comments he used he meant malice, that's the only point I'm making."
Challenged over Mr Smith's use of the word "Chinky" to describe a Chinese person, Mr Farage asked: "If you and your mates are going out for a Chinese, what would you say you were going for?"
And asked if he would himself say he was "going for a Chinky", Mr Farage replied: "No, but a lot of people would. I don't think I've ever used that word."www.aol.co.uk/article/2014/12/19/farage-defends-use-of-chinky-and-poofter/21118900/?icid=maing-grid7|uk|dl1|sec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D316594(I wonder how long before the Prattish Spesh reports this thread?)
|
|
pippop
pc
I love everyone here.
Posts: 1,110
|
Post by pippop on Dec 19, 2014 15:11:47 GMT
I cannot put up my hand; I have said that and I have talked about nipping out to the 'paki' shop etc.
I don't use those types of words so much now.
I'd be happy to talk with you about why I have changed my behaviour (if you're interested).
|
|
|
Post by cleefarqhuar on Dec 19, 2014 18:03:04 GMT
I cannot put up my hand; I have said that and I have talked about nipping out to the 'paki' shop etc. I don't use those types of words so much now. I'd be happy to talk with you about why I have changed my behaviour (if you're interested). Not in the slightest bit interested Spesh my dear friend
|
|
|
Post by jean on Dec 19, 2014 19:13:24 GMT
Hands up all those that have not said at some time they are going for a Chinky takeawy (Jean excepted... You're quite right - I never have. But Not true; I just knew.
|
|
|
Post by systemofadown on Dec 19, 2014 22:09:47 GMT
I cannot put up my hand; I have said that and I have talked about nipping out to the 'paki' shop etc. I don't use those types of words so much now. I'd be happy to talk with you about why I have changed my behaviour (if you're interested). Not in the slightest bit interested Spesh my dear friend There's the rub. Not interested in anyone else's view. Honest but sad.
|
|
|
Post by cleefarqhuar on Dec 20, 2014 8:59:25 GMT
Not in the slightest bit interested Spesh my dear friend There's the rub. Not interested in anyone else's view. Honest but sad. Untrue my dear Spesh I am interested in many views Yours is an exception
|
|
|
Post by VoteUKIP on Dec 20, 2014 11:20:28 GMT
There's the rub. Not interested in anyone else's view. Honest but sad. Untrue my dear Spesh I am interested in many views Yours is an exception The "many views" expressed in the Express. And the Mail. And it should be yours are an exception.
I know you don't like me because I am a bit dark and English isn't my first language but at least I can string a sentence together.
|
|
|
Post by cleefarqhuar on Dec 20, 2014 13:24:07 GMT
Untrue my dear Spesh I am interested in many views Yours is an exception The "many views" expressed in the Express. And the Mail. And it should be yours are an exception.
I know you don't like me because I am a bit dark and English isn't my first language but at least I can string a sentence together.Quite wrong my dear Spesh. My not liking you has nothing whatsoever to do with your colour. It is becauese you are a reactionary idiot and an A1 prat. Most of the 'coloured' people I know and have known and entertain and have entertained in my home make the likes of you appear what you are. An A1 prat
|
|
|
Post by poundland enoch on Dec 20, 2014 13:32:30 GMT
The "many views" expressed in the Express. And the Mail. And it should be yours are an exception.
I know you don't like me because I am a bit dark and English isn't my first language but at least I can string a sentence together.Quite wrong my dear Spesh. My not liking you has nothing whatsoever to do with your colour. It is becauese you are a reactionary idiot and an A1 prat. Most of the 'coloured' people I know and have known and entertain and have entertained in my home make the likes of you appear what you are. An A1 prat What on earth are you talking about? You know nothing about me. As usual you have shown your true nature by dragging 'colour' into it. You really do have a serious problem, you know.
|
|
|
Post by MandyRice on Dec 20, 2014 13:50:04 GMT
I go through life without calling people names. That's for the kindergarten.
Calling people chinks or prats in 2014?
Really?
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Dec 22, 2014 10:24:59 GMT
Whereas calling people "racist" or "bigot", is OK then, when they point to holes in your immigration "policy".
Oh, how the PC do come unstuck with their tunnel vision!
|
|
cheese AND crackers
Guest
|
Post by cheese AND crackers on Dec 22, 2014 12:09:25 GMT
Whereas calling people "racist" or "bigot", is OK then, when they point to holes in your immigration "policy". Oh, how the PC do come unstuck with their tunnel vision! If you search on this board, as I have just done, for posts containing either of those two words you get many, many hits. No surprise.The results are for the most part posts making some variant on the claim that one cannot talk about immigration without being called a racist or a bigot (your post above being a typical example) yet precious few postings (I couldn't find any) actually calling people here those things. Quite the opposite; I think Aqua said he wouldn't call another man a racist unless he was in the same room and there were dueling-pistols to hand. Would a 'PC' person call someone names? Isn't it an un-PC thing to do? ... Right. Yes... Okay - we have just had a vote here at PC WORLD and the DIKTAT is: ALL name-calling is ruled BAD and those who engage in it shall be held in low esteem. This new edict only affects PC Poltroons. Right - thinking people should continue as NORMAL.
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Dec 22, 2014 17:46:22 GMT
The politically correct feel perfectly at ease calling those who disagree with immigration (non)policy "racist" and "bigot". Even our ex-prime minister was caught out using the latter word. UKIP supporters are routinely called "racist". I am a UKIP supporter and I am definitely NOT racist nor are any of the UKIP supporters I know. I definitely do object to many aspects of imported Asian "culture", however, and for very good feminist reasons. And I heartily detest the pernicious, aggressive, repressive death cult of Islam as laid out in the Quran.
So, Crackers, would you and your ilk kindly deal with the actual objections of people like me instead of trying to tar us with a totally inaccurate slur, based on your own ineffable sense of moral superiority, pretty please?
|
|
|
Post by niceEyes on Dec 22, 2014 17:56:25 GMT
The politically correct feel perfectly at ease calling those who disagree with immigration policy "racist" and "bigot". Even our ex-prime minister was caught out using the latter word. UKIP supporters are routinely called "racist". I am a UKIP supporter and I am definitely NOT racist nor are any of the UKIP supporters I know. I definitely do object to many aspects of imported Asian "culture", however, and for very good feminist reasons. And I heartily detest the pernicious, aggressive, repressive death cult of Islam as laid out in the Quran. So, Crackers, would you and your ilk kindly deal with the actual objections of people like me instead of trying to tar us with a totally inaccurate slur, based on your own ineffable sense of moral superiority, pretty please? There are plenty of people on both sides of any argument who are willing to have that argument in a civilised way. Yes the Prime Minister did say that word and look what happened. All decent people said he was wrong to use that kind of language. It doesn't help see? People who do that sort of thing tar themselves. They don't need any help from me.
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Dec 22, 2014 23:11:27 GMT
ISIS jihadis chortle on video over their emulation of Muhammad the slave trader and pederast.
The "depraved and depressing document" cobbled together by ISIS governing the rape and enslavement and sale of non-muslim girl children and women in The Caliphate is, in fact, cobbled together from the Quran and the Hadith - the words and deeds of Muhammad himself. Don't the folk who are so outraged by this document know that it is authentic, original Islam? Why is the Quran never described by the Politically Correct as "depraved and depressing"? Because that is precisely what it is and anyone with the nous to read it knows it. Nevertheless I have been called "racist" for being negative about "the religion of peace". Maybe the excesses of ISIS will bring the Quran under more critical scrutiny by civil and human rights exponents. It would be high time! Why do the politically correct extend to Islam a tenderheartedness that they would not DREAM of extending to way-out Christian fundamentalists? Answer because they are self-hating Uncle Toms who think everything is wrong with West but who bend over backwards to take it up the arse from Islam. And, no, there is no such thing as "moderate Islam". It's a ghastly, inhuman, repressive, misogynistic, death-loving cult that no sane western person with humanistic values should give the time of day to and certainly not in terms of "equality" of respect. Open your eyes, you multiculturalists. The West has much to be proud of but it is failing to live up to its values. Islam thinks the West is a pushover. They are right and political correctness is the origin of the West's supine tolerance of the intolerable.
|
|