|
|
Post by marchesarosa on May 31, 2010 12:09:33 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Aug 5, 2010 8:09:01 GMT
Hide the decline?
Jubilation at IPCC Climate Control Central?
|
|
|
|
Post by rsmith77 on Aug 5, 2010 14:34:22 GMT
Still reading the BBC board - keep up the good work!
|
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Aug 5, 2010 17:03:03 GMT
Thanks mr Smith. Can't you get back on?
|
|
|
|
Post by aquatic on Aug 5, 2010 18:54:25 GMT
You could tell him How, by PM.
But you wouldn't do that, would you?
|
|
|
|
Post by aquatic on Aug 5, 2010 21:14:35 GMT
Why did you (I assume MR) delete my post?
|
|
|
|
Post by aquatic on Aug 5, 2010 21:18:37 GMT
I vote against mods, admin, call them what you will, if they can delete your posts at will.
|
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Aug 6, 2010 9:51:40 GMT
Back on topic again with Climate humour, here, from Fitzy on WUWT a nice piece of satire. This occurred in the course of a discussion about the PNAS blacklist wattsupwiththat.com/2010/08/05/expert-embarrassment-in-climate-change/#more-23048August 5, 2010 at 11:32 pm “About the only merit I can find in the AGW theory, is its a noble lie, whose unintended consequences would be the death of millions, or maybe that is the intended consequence. Shouldn’t talk ill of the departed, I know. Saw the AGW theory lying forlorn in a field the other day, I rushed over, as you do, to see if maybe a vet could help, but it was too late. I knelt down and patted the poor old thing, thinking, at the least it would know it wasn’t alone. However it was cold to the touch, and I figured it must of expired during the night. On closer inspection, I could see that it had been terribly diseased for some time. I think, but i’m no vet, it had Galloping Hubris. Thats the old name of course, country vet lingo, these days they call it Post-Modern-Sarcoma. Along with that most horrid of conditions, I could see something like gang-green had probably finished it off. The rot had set in some time ago, goodness only knows how it had managed to last this long, I think it must of received some kind of pallative care. Probably those hippy kids down the road, bringing it little nuggets to nibble on, that was ultimately a misplaced kindness. It suffered unnecessarily, had the initial disease run its course, it would of passed away years ago. Thats the thing about propping up a dead horse, you just prolong the misery, a bit like that War-On-Terrier across the road. Barks like mad but doesn’t get anywhere with it, left a hell of a mess last time it got out, puking up all over the place, probably been chewing on some dead old theory floating face down in a creek somewhere.” 00000000 And pedants please don't berate me for permitting of/'ve to stand. This is not WoM.
|
|
|
|
Post by aquatic on Aug 6, 2010 12:06:52 GMT
In your #53 and #56 you do make a meal of things, quite gratuitously and inaccurately of course.
Toodle-oo.
|
|
|
|
Post by jean on Aug 6, 2010 13:52:56 GMT
What a stylistic give-away. It's quite clear that aqua and the marchesa are the same person. How could I have been blind to it for so long? |
|
|
|
Post by jean on Aug 6, 2010 14:04:16 GMT
I repost here - and it possibly really does belong on this thread - a comment from WoM which I caught just before it smartly disappeared. Does it make any sense to anyone? Anna just closed the Naomi Campbell thread, with the usual spurious offtopic excuse, where the topic is matters arising from merely black on black genocide, but she won't dare touch this one because there is an Islamic element!www.bbc.co.uk/dna/mbradio4/F2766781?thread=7661433&latest=1 |
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Aug 6, 2010 14:52:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jean on Aug 6, 2010 14:58:26 GMT
I've just reposted it there, marchesa (do keep up!)
|
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Aug 11, 2010 15:27:18 GMT
The dumbing down of once reputable journals.  |
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Aug 17, 2010 15:14:14 GMT
|
|
