|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Dec 16, 2009 8:31:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Dec 16, 2009 8:38:46 GMT
"You might think journalists at a popular science magazine would be able to investigate and reason. In DenierGate, watch New Scientist closely, as they do the unthinkable and try to defend gross scientific malpractice by saying it’s OK because other people did other things a little bit wrong, that were not related, and a long time ago. Move along ladies and gentlemen, there’s nothing to see… The big problem for this formerly good publication is that they have decided already what the answer is to any question on climate-change (and the answer could be warm or cold but it’s always ALARMING). That leaves them clutching for sand-bags to prop up their position as the king-tide sweeps away any journalistic credibility they might have had." more here joannenova.com.au/2009/12/new-scientist-becomes-non-scientist/ |
|
