|
Post by jamesjosh on Jan 16, 2010 13:46:30 GMT
I would have thought that this committee should be more concerned with the criminal population, which according to a recent report numbered 1.9million.
I know, some will say that there are people in prison who should not be there but to me the priority should the safety of the law abiding citizen.
Unfortunately, what comes across from politicians is the view that more attention is paid to the wrong doer rather than the victim.
And if some people are committing crimes due to drug addiction or mental health problems, surely they should not be out in society as they are a danger to themselves, never mind anyone else.
|
|
|
Post by Jade on Jan 25, 2010 15:03:30 GMT
Whilst applauding any act that helps criminals make a different life for themselves when they get out, I would turn a gimlet eye on anyone that suggests that punishment should not follow a crime. It always should.
I remember a long long time ago a prog on R4 asked about the Isle of Man's policy on birching. One of the callers was a scally from L'Pool who cheerfully admitted that he indulged in a spot of burglary, wasn't above a bit of mugging and would help himself ot any of our goods that caught his eye, willingly facing any punishment meted out because when released he could always find a warm bed, a provider of nice meals and a new fresh start to his criminal career
He was disarmingly honest about how the threat of a birching would send him scurrying to his local skills training centre for a new life.
|
|
|
Post by lark descending on Jan 26, 2010 8:07:07 GMT
Jade, you have a point. There is more to sentencing than reforming offenders or protecting the public. There is the small matter of deterrence - even if prison doesn't pose a threat to a habitual petty offender, it sure does to the rest of us, I'll bet.
And then there is good old-fashioned retribution; nothing to do with vengeance (in the sense of malice), just a way of extracting payment for a wrong.
|
|
|
Post by Jade on Jan 26, 2010 11:52:57 GMT
True enough
If I did something wrong (or god forbid was wrongly found guilty of something awful) and was sent to pokey
well
there goes my life. I will never ever get it back. I will not be considered a person to do the work I do, hold the conversations I hold, weild the influence I weild
Earn what I earn
I would be hurled into a different life, one of looking for opportunity to get money to live. Looking for new ways to achieve success and satisfaction.
I might turn into the next Ruth Coe or Mary Kay Ashe (thogh if I had that in me I think it would have emerged already)
or I could be looking at a life on benefits, slipping from one minwage job to another, sinking slowly into a suicidal spiral of lost hope, shattered dreams and rubbish food.
Its certainly enough to make me not want to risk it - but what of those who are already there? Where the life they would have on exiting prison is actually the same or maybe even better?
|
|
|
Post by jamesjosh on Feb 1, 2010 17:19:22 GMT
But then life is about survival and we all try to survive in whatever we can - get a job, rob someone, sell your body etc
|
|
|
Post by lark descending on Feb 1, 2010 22:23:39 GMT
A few days ago someone on the radio was saying that most women in jail "shouldn't be there" and went on to say that many see jail as a place of safety. It doesn't entirely surprise me.
|
|
|
Post by Jade on Feb 3, 2010 11:04:06 GMT
Anyone who thinks jail is prefereable to being free but at home seriously needs to think about their life!
What on earth can be done to help such women see that they do not have to put up with the crap they are running away from?
|
|