|
Post by aquatic on Jul 24, 2010 22:31:49 GMT
Pippa.....you are falling down on your job! The job,that is,of self appointed protector of Johnny's Moth. You have been here,posting up links and threads from my board to show how certain people are "bullying" and "mobbing" the poor chap. Well now....I was taking a look round the BBC and my eye was taken by a thread on TCIY. A thread entitled Blatant cover up by the police. Dear Johnny was getting a frightful kicking from a most vociferous gang of posters. Shall I name them? Well no...I think initials will do. JK,HMJ,P,O,A and SA. I can't think why you weren't there,by his side,protecting him. I'm bloddy livid! First, Jean goes on her multiple hols without inviting ME to go with her! Second, as her JM/pippa-appointed deputy leader of the HITH Gang I wasn't alerted by her to the need to monitor TCIY as well as WoM for JM activity! Third, the gang who've been ganging up on JM there aren't members of the gang I'm in!
|
|
|
Post by aquatic on Jul 24, 2010 22:40:40 GMT
Well, I only skimmed the thread, but wasn't JM nasty? Gratuitously.
|
|
|
Post by sinistral on Jul 24, 2010 22:50:09 GMT
Well, I only skimmed the thread, but wasn't JM nasty? Gratuitously. There you go again.....ganging up....just can't help it can you?
|
|
|
Post by aquatic on Jul 24, 2010 22:52:58 GMT
You see, thinking of JM's MO, liberal-baiting/provoking is a good gallery-pleasing wheeze, which naymissus has exploited to some effect, and marchesarosa has exploited to lesser effect (because she needs the liberals, like me, to support her on, eg, abortion, which we do - no better argument have I read from anyone else), but it's not enough (is it?) to justify aggression and personal attack.
|
|
|
Post by sinistral on Jul 25, 2010 9:35:25 GMT
No indeed it's not,Aqua. The trouble is that it's one thing dealing with the poster in question where you have a choice.Either engage and give as good as you get....or ignore.Though from what I've seen on the BBC boards,and to a small extent experienced,it can be very difficult to keep your distance. What I find disturbing are the "fellow travellers" who are racing round dragging all and sundry through the mire as they fight their little battles and settle old scores.
And nor do I have much respect for those who come inside the tent and then piss on the floor.
|
|
pippa
WH Member
Posts: 230
|
Post by pippa on Jul 25, 2010 14:05:07 GMT
I'm going to have to break off from this specific discussion as something rather curious has come to my attention. Pippa.....you are falling down on your job!The job,that is,of self appointed protector of Johnny's Moth. had a friend over so not been able to look in here. tee hee, oh what a card you are, Sin. and you little monkey, intertwining the threads like this. actually i'm finding it rather depressing and difficult to muster any energy to go there. in any case, to my mind, they're just eejits jumping on a bandwagon. AngusR is an hysteric who was previously cultivated, by guess who, on WoM and was only too eager to get sucked into one particular affray a while back. he flounced off when someone out of the blue told him to grow up. besides, those particular posters are of no consequence and Johnny seems to be batting them aside pretty well, as he does. playground twats as far as i'm aware. no, it's the particularly insidious chain linking back, first instigated a couple of years ago, to which our bounty hunter is linked. that's what concerns me, the fact that there is a connection. and still carrying on as they did when the cakeboard crowd was in operation on the old beeb women's hour board.
|
|
pippa
WH Member
Posts: 230
|
Post by pippa on Jul 25, 2010 14:27:20 GMT
pink? ahhhhhhh poor dear, perhaps a lie down?
|
|
|
Post by sinistral on Jul 25, 2010 17:22:11 GMT
actually i'm finding it rather depressing and difficult to muster any energy to go there. in any case, to my mind, they're just eejits jumping on a bandwagon. AngusR is an hysteric who was previously cultivated, by guess who, on WoM and was only too eager to get sucked into one particular affray a while back. he flounced off when someone out of the blue told him to grow up. besides, those particular posters are of no consequence and Johnny seems to be batting them aside pretty well, as he does. playground twats as far as i'm aware. no, it's the particularly insidious chain linking back, first instigated a couple of years ago, to which our bounty hunter is linked. that's what concerns me, the fact that there is a connection. and still carrying on as they did when the cakeboard crowd was in operation on the old beeb women's hour board. Ah,I see.......now we're getting to the truth of the matter. Here is displayed a rather telling contempt for anyone who fails to see your side of the argument..... "playground twats" indeed. I do hope some of these "twats" are looking in. So now...let's see if I've got this right..... If you can link any poster,no matter how tenuously,with your pet hate (that is the "in" phrase I believe) you will do so...then parade it as proof of "the great conspiracy" And just for good measure,label them hysteric.Any poster that you cannot link in this way is considered to be of no consequence and promptly pushed to one side. Then you tell us that JM "is batting them aside pretty well,as he does" Yes....indeed he does.In fact I cannot recall any occasion when this person has retreated from a thread,cowering under all the "bullying and mobbing" I cannot recall any occasion when he has stopped posting because of the way he has been set upon,either. In fact he thrives on it all. When the water gets a bit too choppy he simply changes ID and starts again. What I can say is that many posters have become so fed up with his insistence that threads be run according to his rules,that they have given up altogether. So m'dear.... You can huff and puff all you like about "bullying and mobbing" You can say eejits,twats and hysterics to all the posters of no consequence...... But I think the vast majority of people who have been on the receiving end of JM's wit and wisdom will see more truth in my words than in yours.
|
|
pippa
WH Member
Posts: 230
|
Post by pippa on Jul 25, 2010 18:06:20 GMT
and i see you rather conveniently failed to include in bold:
"jumping on the bandwagon".
|
|
|
Post by sinistral on Jul 25, 2010 18:46:07 GMT
But Pippa,m'dear....
Thus far you have provided no proof of a bandwagon......
Or indeed anything else,apart from ample evidence of a rather silly personal vendetta
Still,do carry on.....I'm sure it's making interesting reading for all our guests from the BBC boards.
|
|