|
|
Post by havelock on Aug 25, 2010 21:58:17 GMT
I see there are numerous attempts being made to remove/bury science based posts from this blog.
What's the matter - is the science a bit scary for you?
|
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Aug 25, 2010 22:05:51 GMT
You definitely scare me Dr Sprain. Have the gels dcecided to use you as their unguided missile again? You never realise when you're being used, do you?
Forewarned is forearmed. No catpeeing here.
Try to get some counselling instead of stalking me.
Or I may have to ask bets to bar you from this blog.
|
|
|
|
Post by arealfarmer on Aug 25, 2010 22:07:11 GMT
Goodness - whatever can he mean ?
|
|
|
|
Post by havelock on Aug 25, 2010 22:18:37 GMT
I have no idea what you're talking about - I have no knowledge of anyone called Sprain or Bets.
You invited readers of the BBC Science Board to come to this forum to debate Climate Change.
I have posted some scientific papers and findings in the hope of stimulating debate as this blog seems rather one-sided at present.
However, it seems that this must be how you like your 'debate' - unquestioned.
No doubt you will dismiss this post too, never mind, I'm off to bed.
|
|
|
|
Post by havelock on Aug 26, 2010 9:57:35 GMT
It seems very strange but on every thread I started (except this one oddly) there appears an identical graph with no text and no relationship (that I can see) to the thread titles or opening post.
It also seems very strange that there are a whole load of older threads that seem to have empty posts at the end of them.
Is this a problem in the software somewhere?
Who should I notify of these glitches?
|
|
|
|
Post by havelock on Aug 27, 2010 15:27:45 GMT
So definitely no glitch but a determined attempt to bury the (unpalatable?) truth.
Each post to this thread that I have put up in good faith with links to external sites to show provenance is defaced with repetitions of the same graph of Cyclones.
What does that say about the willingness of Marchesarosa to engage in open debate so that readers can make their own decisions?
It seems that this 'Climate Blog' was no more or less than an attempt to brainwash the gullible.
Perhaps any who were naive enough to swallow hook, line and sinker the bias and false facts presented will now see how they have been conned?
|
|
