|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Nov 24, 2012 18:42:12 GMT
Moi? A stalker? On the contrary I have been on the receiving end of stalkers since 2007! I don't dog people's tracks from board to board like visitor, kiteman and joeK have with me. Not satisfied with trying (and succeeding) to get me banned (twice) from the beeb, they then started the same persecution on the Science board (unsuccessfully) and then migrated HERE to continue their obsessive attacks and complain bitterly and repeatedly about the Science Board! Tell us, Visitor, why do you care so much about the Science Board? You have opened several threads here with the simple purpose of attacking the Science Board and me in particular, remember! I have never opened a thread on any board ever to attack you or any of your pals. I simply respond to whatever crass remarks you choose to post here. And you don't like it, naturally. But you have to grin and bear it because there is no catpee button here and no possibility of getting me banned for the specious reasons you and your pals concocted on the BBC boards. Tough. Grow a few more brain cells, listener, and then you might find people have a little more respect for your "thoughts". We don't have to look through many of the posts listed below to find exactly the same personality and pre-occupations on display as you show on this board. www.bbc.co.uk/dna/mbradio4/MP10967204 |
|
pippop
pc 
I love everyone here.
Posts: 1,110
|
Post by pippop on Nov 24, 2012 18:50:57 GMT
Moi? A stalker? On the contrary I have been on the receiving end of stalkers since 2007! I don't dog people's tracks from board to bard like visitor, kite man and joeK have with me. Not satisfied with trying (and succeeding) to get me banned (twice) from the beeb, they then started the same persecution on the Science board (unsuccessfully) and then migrated HERE to continue their obsessive attacks and complain bitterly and repeatedly about the Science Board! Tell us, Visitor, why do you care so much about the Science Board? You have opened several threads here with the simple purpose of attacking the Science Board and me in particular, remember! I have never opened a thread on any board ever to attack you or any of your pals. I simply respond to whatever crass remarks you choose to post here. And you don't like it, naturally. But you have to grin and bear it because there is no catpee button here and no possibility of getting me banned for the specious reasons you and your pals concocted on the BBC boards. Tough. Grow a few more brain cells, listener, and then you might find people have a little more respect for your "thoughts". We don't have to look through many of the posts listed below to find exactly the personality on display as here. www.bbc.co.uk/dna/mbradio4/MP10967204Let me guess: all the members here that you don't like are stalkers and the ones you do like are 'good faith' posters? (...including Shakespeare.) |
|
pippop
pc
I love everyone here.
Posts: 1,110
|
Post by pippop on Nov 24, 2012 18:54:14 GMT
This interminable nonsense about stalkers and what Havelock said to you in 1974 on a message board is sounding a bit forlorn.
|
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Nov 24, 2012 18:55:58 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Nov 24, 2012 19:05:09 GMT
Here comes dear little pippop, right on cue! Why do you bother, my dear! It's so very boring going over your pals' ex-IDs, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
Post by visitor on Nov 24, 2012 19:10:19 GMT
 Strangely like the thread you opened linking me to Anders Beivik. I found it on your pal Lazarus's blog, Visitor! lazarus-on.blogspot.co.uk/I followed your link to Lazarus' site (you really are demonstrating classic cyber stalking) where I found that he had posted the following words directly above the picture that you chose to selectively ignore: "But to really show the absurdity and irrationality of this add campaign, suppose an environmental group had commissioned this"I really don't think you should be allowed to remain unchallenged when you have clearly misrepresented somebody who is not here. Lazarus is clearly pointing to the stupidity of using such a poster, not endorsing the approach. |
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Nov 24, 2012 19:34:45 GMT
The point is you thought you would use the same trick of guilt by association to smear me, Louise! There was no light touch "satire" evident in your post. There never is. It's just sledgehammer misrepresentation of me as either homophobic, anti-science, a denier or a racist.
Your latest "Mental Health" thread was a little too obviously pointed, also, Visitor. Was it nay or me or someone else you had in your oh-so-compassionate sights? Who did you get the idea from? Pippop? It's just her style!
I saw the Lazarus link on a BBC religion board, I think. He obviously wanted to drum up some support for his board! He was having a conversation with you at the time, Listener!
This is just the opposite of stalking, visitor, it is laying bare for all to see the foolish sock puppetry and hive mind behind the utterly incomprehensible unpleasantness of you cake boarders.
I don't mind anyone disagreeing with me and stating a case but people dogging me around cyberspace and adopting new IDs to cover their snide obsession and propensity to libel is getting tiresome.
I'd stop it if I were you, m'dear. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Cyberspace may not be quite so anonymous as you think.
|
|
|
|
Post by visitor on Nov 24, 2012 19:54:33 GMT
Good God woman, get over yourself.
|
|
|
|
Post by lazarus on Nov 25, 2012 0:41:13 GMT
This thread has been flaged up on my blog. Perhaps someone can tell me the context that my post which is clearly satire is being used?
|
|
