|
|
Post by arealfarmer on Dec 9, 2009 14:57:45 GMT
still, it would be nice to be free from the rather dodgy types who control the oil, no? And if the only way to do that is to create a blizzard (pardon the pun) of "Global Warming" stories, well fair enough Hhmmnnn. Well Jade , on the same premise , presumably you would feel happy if the police were to doctor evidence to "prove" the guilt of an innocent suspect on the basis that he/she has "got away with " other things ? |
|
|
|
Post by Jade on Dec 9, 2009 14:58:24 GMT
so good you said it twice huh?  |
|
|
|
Post by marchesarosa on Oct 14, 2012 10:27:43 GMT
The Central England Temperature series, the longest thermometer record in the world (claimed as a pretty good indicator of the trend in the whole of the Northern Hemisphere) shows this.  In fact, the CET goes back much further than shown above. See the ACTUAL temperatures (rather than 'anomalies') below. By the way, why do alarmists always place some arbitrary baseline across their graphs (as above) to try to isolate the recent past from the rest as if it were a grotesque departure from normal natural variation?  Why did the Met Office start it's anomalies graph only at 1772? Because if it showed the full data series back to 1659 it would reveal a startlingly rapid temperature increase from about 1695 to about 1738 followed by a very steep dive that makes the rest of the series look pretty unastounding! More like the "long, slow thaw out of the Little Ice Age" that has actually happened. The actual Central England Temperature series shows nothing "alarming"at all, does it gels, apart from long-term natural variation? That is why it rarely gets an outing by alarmists. |
|
