|
Post by sweetjessicajane on Sept 16, 2014 8:49:37 GMT
So could the victims in Rotherham claim they were victims of racially motivate crime -if they did so would the perpetrators face harsher sentencing? An interesting question That the perpetrators have not been so charged (additionally to the rape/grooming charges) may indicate that they were not racially motivated; on the other hand it seems that the 'racial hatred' charges are reluctantly invoked against ethnic minorities (I may be wrong but there are certainly instances when blatant racially aggravated crimes by ethnic minorities have had the 'racist' element disregarded) www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2756140/Rotherham-child-abuse-victim-confronts-alleged-abuser-street-SHE-arrested-van-load-police.htmlIt seems for the men to attack the girls was not a racially motivated crime, but for a victim to confront her alleged attacker is considered a racially motivated - if this proceeds further and the woman is charged and goes to trail, it seems to confirm that only whites can be racist, or more correctly the application of the law unequal.
|
|
|
Post by sweetjessicajane on Nov 20, 2014 11:39:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by cleefarqhuar on Nov 20, 2014 12:51:44 GMT
The answer is surely simple, SJJ, inverted racism
|
|
|
Post by Jonjel on Nov 20, 2014 14:43:32 GMT
The report I read Clee was that specific instructions were given that ALL reference to the ethnic group the drivers belonged to should be erased.
I think the truth is that people might want to tell the truth but are shit scared of being labelled racist, so either can't or are prevented from doing so.
|
|
|
Post by cleefarqhuar on Nov 20, 2014 16:32:48 GMT
I think the truth is that people might want to tell the truth but are shit scared of being labelled racist, so either can't or are prevented from doing so. You possess the propensity to strike the spike on the cranium, dear Jonjel
|
|